Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

HTTPS

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (LockA locked padlock) or https:// means you have safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

  • Environmental Topics
  • Laws & Regulations
  • Report a Violation
  • About EPA
Contact Us

Grantee Research Project Results

Evaluation of Chemical and Biological Assays as Indicators of Toxic Metal Bioavailability in Soils

EPA Grant Number: R829418E02
Title: Evaluation of Chemical and Biological Assays as Indicators of Toxic Metal Bioavailability in Soils
Investigators: Pierzynski, G. M.
Current Investigators: Pierzynski, G. M. , Lydy, Michael J. , Schneegurt, Mark
Institution: Kansas State University
Current Institution: Kansas State University , Southern Illinois University - Carbondale , Wichita State University
EPA Project Officer: Chung, Serena
Project Period: September 24, 2001 through September 23, 2003 (Extended to February 23, 2005)
Project Amount: $141,500
RFA: EPSCoR (Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research) (2000) RFA Text |  Recipients Lists
Research Category: EPSCoR (The Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research)

Objective:

Metal contamination is one of the greatest human health risks, particularly to children, and a real threat to ecosystems at every trophic level. We propose to examine a series of biological and chemical assays to compare their effectiveness in adequately including the effects of bioavailability in dose-response assessments. The design of the study will afford an opportunity to compare results from different dose-response assays in soils of known metal concentration and bioavailability level to similar assays with contaminated soils for which we will not have bioavailability information.

Approach:

The test organisms for the proposed studies will include two plant species, three species of oligochaete worms, and a variety of indigenous and laboratory microbes. Dose-response curves will be generated by observing endpoints having a reasonable expectation of indicating bioavailability. These include mortality, metabolic and growth measures, as well as metal bioaccumulation. Chemical amendments of soil mixtures and added metal salts will be used to generate a range of expected metal availabilities. Comparisons will be made to chemical assays of availability including cation exchange strips and sequential extractions. We also will determine the influence of soil microbial activity on the stability of metal complexes formed by amendment of metal-contaminated soils, as microbes are not only subject to the level of metal bioavailability in soils but can influence the level of metal bioavailability in soils.

Expected Results:

Our goal is to determine which of our biological and chemical assays are the most reliable and consistent measures of bioavailability over a range of metal concentrations, metal sources, soil amendments, and availabilities.

Publications and Presentations:

Publications have been submitted on this project: View all 10 publications for this project

Journal Articles:

Journal Articles have been submitted on this project: View all 4 journal articles for this project

Supplemental Keywords:

ecological risk assessment, zinc, cadmium, lead, earthworms, heavy metals, soil contamination., Scientific Discipline, Health, Waste, TREATMENT/CONTROL, POLLUTANTS/TOXICS, Contaminated Sediments, Environmental Chemistry, Remediation, Chemicals, Chemistry, Technology, Risk Assessments, Environmental Engineering, environmental technology, dose-response, biodegradation, contaminated sediment, remediation technologies, bioavailability, chemical contaminants, biological assay, catalysts, bioremediation of soils, human exposure, engineering, biotechnology, assessment methods, heavy metals, human health risk, bioremediation

Progress and Final Reports:

  • 2002
  • 2003 Progress Report
  • 2004
  • Final Report
  • Top of Page

    The perspectives, information and conclusions conveyed in research project abstracts, progress reports, final reports, journal abstracts and journal publications convey the viewpoints of the principal investigator and may not represent the views and policies of ORD and EPA. Conclusions drawn by the principal investigators have not been reviewed by the Agency.

    Project Research Results

    • Final Report
    • 2004
    • 2003 Progress Report
    • 2002
    10 publications for this project
    4 journal articles for this project

    Site Navigation

    • Grantee Research Project Results Home
    • Grantee Research Project Results Basic Search
    • Grantee Research Project Results Advanced Search
    • Grantee Research Project Results Fielded Search
    • Publication search
    • EPA Regional Search

    Related Information

    • Search Help
    • About our data collection
    • Research Grants
    • P3: Student Design Competition
    • Research Fellowships
    • Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR)
    Contact Us to ask a question, provide feedback, or report a problem.
    Last updated April 28, 2023
    United States Environmental Protection Agency

    Discover.

    • Accessibility
    • Budget & Performance
    • Contracting
    • EPA www Web Snapshot
    • Grants
    • No FEAR Act Data
    • Plain Writing
    • Privacy
    • Privacy and Security Notice

    Connect.

    • Data.gov
    • Inspector General
    • Jobs
    • Newsroom
    • Open Government
    • Regulations.gov
    • Subscribe
    • USA.gov
    • White House

    Ask.

    • Contact EPA
    • EPA Disclaimers
    • Hotlines
    • FOIA Requests
    • Frequent Questions

    Follow.